jobs

repetition between methodology and pg 20

Upto date tables with new references

It was noted to date that the references in the table are a few years old.

Should they be updated:

The impact of supplychaincomplexity on manufacturing plant performance http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272696308000570

Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x/abstract;jsessionid=3B79DE25F4BFCC214A4710E3A2CE620E.d02t03?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false

References to be added:

many to be added

Progress on TO BE

1. Added a new introduction section that addresses point 1 (conceptual modelling in general)
     PA:  Is it bitty? too long?
             Reviewer asks that the case is made for the need for SCM academics.

Add refs

2. Conmtribution - seems more clearer now. 

    PA: to tidy up?

3.  Pavel to check whether the references to Weaver (2010) are necessary?

4. Similar to 3, not many perspectives exist. Argue this case.

5.  Tables are reformed.

6.  This requires a good read / revise.

7.  Paper is made more unique.

8.  Made clear that is a case illustration.

Miles to check:   it says case illustrations.


Utility section:
- take out 5.1 -- check?
- take out bits now in methodology section -- check?
- describe the problems

General comment:

tables explained in text

Outstanding for Miles:
References need to be done

Use of an illustration case

R3 calls for a more unique case, this would require alot more work and is the focus of future work.

Therefore, it needs to be clear Yin type arguments and why we are using ' archival cases' in this bit and  later an industrial case. This needs to be made more explicit in the RM section.