The previous meeting with Pavel led to an action to put the tables back into the paper, Pavel to read it and respond to the reviewer 3 comments.
We need to work smart on each of the papers.
The questions for Pavel to address while reading the paper include:
Q1. Contribution: What is the contribution
of this paper beyond Robinson’s work? Is it just the SCM application? If it is,
then I would re-position the paper and focus on that with some new SCM ideas.
! A procedure is proposed that combines domain-knowledge in the form of SCOR with general concepts and addresses the requirements for developing conceptual modelling approaches. Not only is there limited guidance, no complete review of this guidance and how it can be synthesised into a new methodology has yet to be studied.
Q2. Is the methodology unique? Can he be improved?
Other discussion points:
A. Can
this same proposed 7-phase method be applied to any other conceptual modeling? Why or why not?
B. The flow of the paper seems disjointed and hard for the reader to follow. Can this be amended PA?
No comments:
Post a Comment